My point is that these "quality of life changes" as you call them (I'd call them "playability fixes" personally, but that's not at issue right now) wouldn't have been needed at all had you kept landscape instead of portrait. So the rationale that it makes things easier doesn't really hold to scrutiny. Now before you can implement changes and updates to the game, you also have to rework the portrait interface to make it as functional, as easy to use, as landscape was.
Adventure capitalist support codes for gold update#
Having to implement every new update for two separate orientations is twice the work. The rationale behind reducing gameplay to a single orientation is solid (even if it sounds like PR drivel when repeated ad nauseam to core players, those of us who have been most vocal about the decision). You're adding new UI elements, altering existing ones, moving and rearranging and all that in an effort to overhaul the user interface to make portrait mode more usable. So now you're working to make portrait mode more usable. You claim to have usage data that indicated the majority of players used portrait instead, which for the sake of this discussion we'll assume is accurate. You guys have gotten a lot of crap lately (rightly so, IMO) about dropping the landscape orientation. We appreciate your continued support of AdVenture Capitalist and encourage you to reach out again if you have any further questions! So hopefully we'll have a better answer next year." To answer directly though, we'll need to fix the system before we can decide the future of more planets.
"Heyya, great question, not the greatest answer unfortunately. As for new planets, Remy had a chance to answer this question earlier in the AMA: Thanks for taking the time to reach out with your questions! We currently do not have set plans to add incentives to replay the existing planets.
Lindsay (AdVenture Capitalist Community Member) Stay tuned for more information and upcoming updates! So hopefully we'll have a better answer next year. Maybe you'll go right from Earth to the Moon & mars, or bounce back and forth, or they could even become special weekly events. We're trying to figure out the best way to make the most of this system in the future as it definitely needs something an overhaul. Only about a third of players actually even access the moon, and mars is even smaller. So planets are interesting, they break up the experience and give people a different way to play the game, but they're actually not a very successful feature if we're being totally honest. Heyya, great question, not the greatest answer unfortunately. Here is what Remy had to say about the potential for new planets it AdVenture Capitalist: Initially your post will be deleted or removed and continual abuse will lead to being banned.Ĥ) All Reddit rules are in force including those not listed above. This includes but not limited to duplicating things and leaderboard cheating. Information that is designed to exploit the game in a way that is not designed.This will not be accepted, and this rule is strictly enforced.ģ) Posts and comments that contain information relating to any of the following are not allowed: Any other posts will be deleted and continued abuse will be banned.Ģ) Do not abuse or otherwise threaten any moderators or members of this subreddit. Questions, comments, suggestions? Contact here.ġ) Posts must be related in some way to Adventure Capitalist.
0 kommentar(er)
